Tuesday, March 5, 2019
Surprise Me - Rav Weinberger's Drasha on the Women's Geula Event & Parshas Vayakheil
Below, please find this adaptation of Rav Weinberger's drasha from this Shabbos, parshas Vayakheil5779. Rav Weinberger has reviewed this write-up and any corrections are incorporated herein. Enjoy!
If you enjoy these drasha write-ups or any of Rav Weinberger's teachings, now is the time to please reserve seats or give generously/take out a journal ad for the major dinner we're having honoring Rav and Rebbetzin Weinberger next month. This will go toward enabling Rav Weinberger's teachings to continue to go out to the world for the next 25 years IY"H!! CLICK HERE to donate/reserve.
If you enjoy these drasha write-ups or any of Rav Weinberger's teachings, now is the time to please reserve seats or give generously/take out a journal ad for the major dinner we're having honoring Rav and Rebbetzin Weinberger next month. This will go toward enabling Rav Weinberger's teachings to continue to go out to the world for the next 25 years IY"H!! CLICK HERE to donate/reserve.
Rav Moshe Weinberger
Parshas Vayakheil 5779
Surprise Me
A
remarkable event occurred this past Tuesday. Tens of thousands of holy Jewish
women around the world gathered together to daven together for the redemption.
Strangely, because my name was listed alongside the gedolim who lent
their names and approval for the event, I received several dozen phone calls
from concerned rabbis who apparently did not wish to call Rav Chaim Kanievsky
or Rav Reuven Feinstein to criticize their support for this day of tefillah.
These phone calls caused me to ask myself why Jewish women today are more
aligned with the desire to bring the world to the final redemption? Why not the
men? What particular feminine quality primes women for this type of holy
endeavor even more than men?
Let
us delve into this question in light of the first major project to which the
entire nation dedicated themselves, the building of the Mishkan. In parshas
Terumah, there is no mention of the women participating in the donations to
or the building of the Mishkan: “Speak to the children of Israel an,
‘And you shall take for Me a gift from every man…” (Shmos 25:2).
But in Vayakheil, the Torah and Chazal strongly emphasize women’s
contributions: “The men came with the women, every generous-hearted person…”
(ibid. 35:22). According to Ramban and Rabbeinu Bachaya, only the women brought
gold. The men only donated things of lesser value. And the Torah continues,
“And every wise-hearted woman spun with her hands…. And all the women whose
hearts uplifted them with wisdom, spun the goat hair” (ibid. 25-26). The women
were engaged in spinning goat’s hair in the most remarkable way to make the
highest-possible-quality material for the Mishkan.
We
see that Hashem and Chazal wished to emphasize how the women were at the very
center of the project to donate-to and build the Mishkan? Why is this? And why
were the women not mentioned at all in parshas Terumah?
In
chapter 18 of Messilas Yesharim, the Ramchal zt’l explains
what the trait of piety – chassidus means. It means thinking what Hashem
would appreciate above-and-beyond what is required and doing that for G-d. To
put this in modern terms, chassidus means doing the same thing for
Hashem that one does when he or she makes a surprise party for someone they
love. There are certain things one needs in a relationship and it is perfectly
appropriate for ask one’s partner to fulfill that need. In such instances, the
fact that one person asked takes nothing away from the value of the other
person’s fulfillment of that need. But it is nonsensical for one person to ask,
“Honey, next week is my fortieth birthday. Can you please make me a surprise
party?” By definition, a surprise party is something that arises from the heart
of the one planning it for the other. Asking for a surprise party is an
exercise in absurdity.
But
the Ramchal teaches us that Hashem says to us, “Surprise Me!” Although Hashem
knows what we are thinking and planning, it makes Him so happy when we say to
ourselves, “What would Hashem really love? What would give Him nachas?”
There are many things that are required by halachah. And if a Jew
observes Shabbos according to every din in Shulchan Aruch and Mishnah
Berurah, including the rules of oneg Shabbos by singing at the
Shabbos table and enjoying the traditional Shabbos foods, one cannot have any
claim against him. But this is not chassidus. A chassid always thinks about what Chazal
say, “I have a great gift in my treasure house and it is called Shabbos” (Shabbos
10b). He recognizes that Shabbos is a gift so he wants to reciprocate that
present by asking what would make Hashem happy even though it is not required.
One
of the most apparent differences between men and women is that the vast
majority of men do not go beyond what is technically asked and required of
them, whereas women often understand intuitively what another person needs or
wants without being explicitly asked. This difference is apparent in a
remarkable teaching by the Maharal on the passuk, “Thus shall you
say to the house of Yaakov [the women] and tell to the children of Israel [the
men]” (Shmos 19:3). Rashi explains that this passuk
teaches that Moshe was commanded to speak gently to the women, but more
directly or harshly to the men. Most people understand Rashi to mean
that women are more sensitive, so one must treat them with kid gloves and walk
on eggshells around them, lest one hurt their feelings.
But
the Maharal (Drush Al HaTorah: “V’sageid l’Bnei Yisroel…”)
explains quite differently. The only way men are likely to do what is needed
only if they are told clearly, in no uncertain terms, exactly what is expected
of them. If one uses subtly or expects them to infer what they should do, the
message is likely to go right over their heads. Moshe was therefore told to
command the men in direct, succinct, and unambiguous language, lest they miss
the point. But with respect to the women, Hashem told him to speak gently with
them because He knew that the women would infer even from indirect or gentle
language everything that they could do for G-d even without being told
explicitly.
We
can now understand why the Torah doesn’t mention the women in parshas
Terumah, the parshah in which Hashem commanded exactly what the Jewish
people were required to do with respect to the building of the Mishkan.
But parshas Vyakheil is the parshah of the actual carrying out of the
donations-to and the building of the Mishkan. The women were not
included in the initial commandment because Hashem knew they love to surprise
other people. He knew they would participate without being formally commanded.
And this played out in Vayakheil, where the women donated even more
generously than the men and spun the materials for the Mishkan in the
most remarkable way to ensure that it was of the highest quality.
This
also explains why tens of thousands of women gathered together around the world
to find a new way to beg Hashem to redeem us. And it sheds light on the
perplexing phenomenon of so many rabbis and men who were confounded by the
event. I explained to a number of people that besides the fact that Rav Chaim
Kanievsky shlita, and Rav Reuven Feinstein shlita lent their
approbations to the event, the Chofetz Chaim in his sefer Tzipisa
L’yeshua, lamented how desensitized we have become to our exile, saying
that he did not understand why men and women were not marching in the streets
begging Hashem for the redemption. There were even people who criticized the Chofetz
Chaim for making such a “big deal” about lashon hara. Yet today
everyone recognizes the importance of emphasizing and holding events to
strengthen this aspect of our service of G-d.
Thankfully,
the Jewish women of today and are the forefront of making this “surprise party”
for G-d – holding an event to daven, beg, and plead that Hashem’s glory return
to earth with the coming of the complete redemption soon in our days. May their
and our prayers be answered quickly!
Click here to get Dixie Yid in your e-mail Inbox or here to "follow" me on Twitter.
Wednesday, February 6, 2019
To Serve G-d - Rav Moshe Weinberger's Drasha on Mishpatim
[フレーム]
See here for past shiurim at YUTorah.org's website by Rav Weinberger both as leader of Emek HaMelech, as former Mashpia at YU, and from the past 20+ years. You can also click on one of the following links to subscribe to the shiurim: email , rss feed , podcast , or iTunes . Please note that these drashos will only be available online for one month. If you notice any mistakes, please let me know so I can correct it. If you are interested in a particular drasha that is no longer online, you can email me (right sidebar) and I'll send it to you IY"H, BL"N.
Click here to get Dixie Yid in your e-mail Inbox or here to "follow" me on Twitter.
Below, please find this adaptation of Rav Weinberger's drasha from this Shabbos, parshas Mishpatim5779. Rav Weinberger has reviewed this write-up and any corrections are incorporated herein. Enjoy!
If you enjoy these drasha write-ups or any of Rav Weinberger's teachings, now is the time to please reserve seats or give generously/take out a journal ad for the major dinner we're having honoring Rav and Rebbetzin Weinberger next month. This will go toward enabling Rav Weinberger's teachings to continue to go out to the world for the next 25 years IY"H!! CLICK HERE to donate/reserve.
If you enjoy these drasha write-ups or any of Rav Weinberger's teachings, now is the time to please reserve seats or give generously/take out a journal ad for the major dinner we're having honoring Rav and Rebbetzin Weinberger next month. This will go toward enabling Rav Weinberger's teachings to continue to go out to the world for the next 25 years IY"H!! CLICK HERE to donate/reserve.
Rav Moshe Weinberger
Parshas Mishpatim 5779
To Serve G-d
It
is impossible not to notice how we went from the drama and intensity of
Hashem’s revelation at Har Sinai and the giving of the Aseres
HaDibros amidst Divine revelation, thunder, and lightning at the end of
last week’s parsha, to the minutiae of civil laws that fill the majority
of this week’s parsha. The Torah then returns to the drama of the events
leading up to the revelation at Sinai and our acceptance of the Torah at the
end of the parshah. One could get whiplash from the quick transition
between Har Sinai, the litany of laws governing interpersonal
relationships, and back to Sinai. Why does the Torah interrupt the revelation
narrative with this legalistic intermission?
I
once heard an answer to the well-known question on the Pesach Haggadah from my
Rebbe, Reb Dovid Lifshitz zt’l, in the name of Rav Meir Shapiro zt’l.
Why do we sing, in Dayeinu, “If He had drawn us close to Har Sinai
but not given us the Torah, it would have been enough for us.” The whole point
of bringing us to Sinai was to receive the Torah. How could coming to that
place without receiving the Torah possibly have been enough?
Rav
Shapiro answered by quoting Rashi (dibur hamaschil “lakol”
on Zevachim 116a), who says that something new happened when the Jewish
people arrived at Sinai. Before that, Jews and Bnei Noach both only
brought olos(elevation) offerings. But after arriving at Sinai, Jewish
people then began bringing shlamim (peace) offerings. What is the
difference between olos and shlamim? An olah offering is
completely consumed by fire on the altar. And a shalmim is consumed by
the altar, as well as the kohanim and the one who brought the sacrifice.
This explains why we were thankful for arriving at Sinai even if we would not
have received the Torah. We were then able to bring shlamim offerings.
But
what is the deeper meaning of this? What is the deeper benefit for being able
to offer one additional type of sacrifice? Are we really singing out praises to
G-d for being able to eat more meat? What was the reason for this change and
what underlying transformation was it expressing?
The
Volozhiner yeshiva was in dire financial straits. Rav Chaim Volozhiner zt’l
therefore sent out messengers (meshulachim) to different cities and
towns throughout Europe to raise desperately needed funds for the yeshiva.
One particular meshulach arrived in a certain very poor village. No one
was able to give more than a few pennies. But the people there told him that
there was one rich man in town. However, he was very stingy and never gave to
anyone for any reason. The meshulach asked where the man davened.
The people told him, so the man planned to speak to the wealthy person every
day after davening.
The
meshulach went over to the man immediately after Shacharis the
next morning. As he approached, the man immediately sensed where this was going
and told him, “Don’t even bother. I’m not giving you any money.” But the meshulach
persisted, “No, let me just tell you about the great Reb Chaim Volozhiner!” He
proceeded to tell him about the quality of the Torah learning, how this was the
only yeshivah in Lithuania, and the great merit of Torah learning created by
the boys in the yeshivah. But the man still refused to give.
The
meshulach then carried out his plan by approaching the man after Shacharis,
Mincha, and Maariv every day. Finally, after a few days, as he
approached the man to extol the virtues of the yeshiva, the man said
that the meshulach should come to his home at a certain time that night
to meet with him there. Everyone around was extremely impressed because no one
had ever even gotten that far.
That
night, at the appointed time, the meshulach arrived. When he got there,
the man said that he would give an extraordinarily large amount – an amount
which would have supported the yeshivah for months. The meshulach
was elated. But, knowing that meshulachim were entitled to take a
percentage of the amount donated to support themselves and enable them to
continue collecting, the man said, “I am giving this donation on one condition:
that you do not receive any portion of the gift. It must all go to the yeshiva.”
He would not consider any arguments or any alternatives. Having no choice, the meshulach
agreed to the condition.
The
wealthy man, however, decided that he did not fully trust the meshulach
to carry out his instructions, so he told him, “I am not going to send this
money to the yeshivah with you. Rather, I am going to give it to the
great Rav Chaim Volozhiner personally.” The man then arranged to travel with
the meshulach to Volozhin. When he arrived, he greeted Rav Chaim and
happily handed him the entire donation. Pleased with himself, he told Rav Chaim
the amount of the donation and the rosh yeshiva was both happy and quite
relieved. But the man could not help himself. He clarified, “I must tell the
Rav that I have placed a condition on this gift. It is only to be used to
support the talmidei chachamim in the yeshiva. None of it may be used
for ancillary purposes such as payment to the meshulach. It is
completely sanctified to the yeshiva.”
Rav
Chaim then made a face and immediately handed the gift back to the donor,
commenting, “Ah korban fun a goy – a gentile offering.” Shocked that his
gift was refused, he asked the rosh yeshiva, “What do you mean a gentile
offering! This is the first time I am making a donation. Why would the Rav say
that to me?” Rav Chaim answered, “Non-Jews also bring sacrifices, but only olos,
which are completely burned on the altar. They want their sacrifices only to go
to Heaven – to G-d. They do not want them to benefit human beings here on
earth. But Jewish people also bring shlamim offerings, which benefit not
only the altar, but also the kohanim, himself, his friends, and his
family.” Jewish people understand that that their service of G-d is not
exclusively for Heaven. We serve Hashem by giving other Jews whatever they
need, some food to eat or a place to live. We want our gifts to G-d to also
benefit His children, our brothers and sisters.
Based
on what Rav Chaim taught that man, perhaps we can understand why we would have
felt satisfied if Hashem had brought us to Har Sinai without giving us
the Torah. Only then were we able to start bringing shlamim offerings.
The word shlamim comes a root word meaning not only “peace,” but also
“whole.” We were able to bring shalmim offerings because we recognized
that none of us can do everything by him or herself. We must make each other
whole and allow others to make us whole. We became a nation who finally understood
that serving G-d does not only mean doing things for G-d alone. It also means
doing good things to benefit Hashem’s children, our Jewish brothers and
sisters. This revelation alone, even before we received the Torah, was cause
for gratitude and celebration because only then
were we truly “like one man with one heart” (Rashi on Shmos
19:2).
We
can now also understand why the Torah places the civil laws of parshas
Mishpatim between the beginning and end of the story of the revelation at
Sinai. Hashem is telling us that the way we treat other people is not an
interruption getting in the way of our Divine service. It is an integral part
of it. “Just as these [the Aseres HaDibros] are from Sinai, so too these
[the civil laws in parshas Mishpatim] are from Sinai” (Rashi on Shmos
21:1). We must make helping and doing good for other Jews an integral part of
the aspects of our Divine service we work on continually improving because it
is an inseparable aspect of it.
Rav
Yochanan Twersky zy’a, the Tolna Rebbe of Yerushalyim, lived a very
simple life, but always helped some of the lost Jews of Yerushalayim by
allowing them to live in his small apartment and sharing what he and his family
had with them. One year, at the Pesach Seder, the Rebbe noticed
that this man had been seated between the children at the table. To his horror,
he noticed the boys sitting on either side of him inching their chairs as far
away from him as they could. To ensure that the man did not notice and get
embarrassed, he called out, “How did this happen that my esteemed guest was
seated with the children. He should sit by my side!” He proceeded to ensure
that the man was seated to his right, in the most honored seat at the Seder.
The man felt amazing.
When
Chol HaMoed began, the Rebbe summoned the children to his study and
rebuked them, which was generally quite out of character for him: “When you
moved away from that man at the Seder, it could have embarrassed him, One
cannot do such things!” One of the boys protested, “But Rebbe, the man smelled
so bad. We couldn’t stay beside him.” The Rebbe was taken aback, “No! A Jew
smells good! A Jew smells very good! I am a connoisseur of scents and this Jew
smelled very good.”
We
must see the grace and beauty in other Jews to recognize that caring for them
is part and parcel of how we serve Hashem. May we merit to serve Hashem not
only with service directed Heavenward, but also by taking care of all of His
children, our brothers and sisters. May we then merit to see, soon in our days,
the time when Moshiach will teach and judge us by smelling so much deeper that
one can see externally (Yeshayahu 11:3; Sanhedrin 93b).
Click here to get Dixie Yid in your e-mail Inbox or here to "follow" me on Twitter.
Sunday, January 20, 2019
The Song of Miriam - Rav Moshe Weinberger's Drasha on Parshas Beshalach/Shabbos Shirah 5779
Below, please find this adaptation of Rav Weinberger's drasha from this Shabbos, parshas Beshalach5779. Rav Weinberger has reviewed this write-up and any corrections are incorporated herein. Enjoy!
Rav Moshe Weinberger
Parshas Beshalach – Shabbos Shirah 5779
The Song of Miriam
We
spoke on parshas Va’eira about the different leadership qualities of
Moshe and Aharon, how Hashem expresses Himself as “The Holy One” versus the
“Divine Presence,” and the different ways mothers and fathers express their
love for their children. On this Shabbos of the Song at the Sea and the Song of
Devorah, let us understand more deeply how women and mothers are the source of
our ability to succeed in this world.
The
men sang “I will sing to Hashem for He is very exalted…” (Shmos 15:1).
And regarding the women’s song, the passuk says, “And Miriam called out
to them, ‘Sing to Hashem for He is very exalted…’” (ibid 21). Why was it Miriam
who led the women’s song?
We
see that many years earlier, when she was just a child of six years old,
Pharaoh decreed, “Throw every newborn son into the river” (Shmos 1:22).
According to Chazal (Sota 12a; Shmos Raba 1:19), Miriam’s
father Amram, the greatest sage of the generation, gave up all hope and
separated from his wife, and all the other men followed suit, lest they give
birth to children who would immediately be murdered. It was only little Miriam
who stood up and started a movement against the despair which had overtaken the
entire generation: “Father! Your decree is worse than Pharaoh’s!” He brought
her argument before the beis din and he and they agreed with Miriam.
Only Miriam’s courage was able to overcome the despondency that had infected the
leaders of the generation.
We
see something similar in this week’s haftarah in which the general Barak
and the rest of the men were overcome with fear of the Kena’ani army and
their general Sisra. When the passuk says, “The caravans ceased, the
travelers walked on crooked paths” (Shoftim 5:6), Rashi explains
that this was because “the Jewish people were afraid to travel because of the
enemy.” Normal life stopped because the people were paralyzed with fear.
And
even when Devorah communicated the prophetic message that Hashem would deliver Kena’an
into their hands, Barak was still afraid. He told her, “If you will go with me,
then I will go, but if you will not go with me, I will not go” (ibid.4:8).
She agreed and thereby led the entire army to victory.
But
this decisive defeat of the enemy’s will to fight came through another woman,
Yael, who personally assassinated Sisra in his own tent! (ibid. 21). Devorah
herself acknowledged the fact that Jewish women brought about the victory in
the song she sang celebrating Hashem’s deliverance. She relates how life
stopped for the Jewish people “until I, Devorah, rose up, until a mother of
Israel rose up” (ibid. 5:7). Chazal tell us that the Jewish people’s
victory in this war arose from the feminine side. They say the same thing about
our victory on Purim, when victory also came through a Jewish woman, Esther.
How
were Miriam, Devorah, Yael, and Esther able to revive the hopes of the Jewish
people when no one else could? We see the power of a “mother of Israel” to
inspire confidence, bravery, and strength in the people. While the men carried
the physical weapons (כלי נשק), the Jewish mothers
used something even more powerful than weapons, but which shares the same
Hebrew root word: kisses – נשיקות. A mother has the
power to speak to her children, her husband, or the entire Jewish people and
tell them, “You can do it! Hashem is with you! You will succeed!”
After
the salvation at the sea in this week’s parshah, the men proudly said,
“I will sing to Hashem!” But where did they get the strength to sing? There is
a backstory. When the passuk says, “And Miriam called out to them, ‘Sing
to Hashem,’” who was she speaking to? The men? The women? Both? The word for
“them” in the passuk is masculine, not feminine, which could indicate
that Miriam was speaking only to the men, or, at the very least, to both men
and women. According to one opinion in Chazal, Miriam was speaking not just to
the women, but to Moshe and the elders.
According
to this opinion, the men received the strength to sing from Miriam, the woman
who, as a child, had saved the Jewish people from despair of Pharaoh’s decree!
Right after the song at the sea, Moshe told us, “If you will listen to the voice of Hashem your
G-d, do what is straight in His eyes, hearken to His mitzvos, and
observe His laws, I will not place on you the entire sickness that I placed on
Egypt” (Shmos 15:26). The passuk says “sickness,” singular,
rather than sicknesses, plural. According to the seforim hakedoshim, she
saved the Jewish people from the most debilitating sickness of all – despair.
As a child, and again at the sea, she told her brothers and sisters, “Be alive!
You can do it! Hashem is with us!”
The
womb is called the “source” of life in Hebrew – מקור.
And the numerical value of that word is equivalent to the word for “will” or
“desire” – רצון. Jewish women and mothers build us up from
womb to tomb so that we have the capacity to get out of bed and do what we need
to do to connect to Hashem and build the world.
The
feminine side of Shabbos empowers us in a similar way. When the Shabbos Queen
arrives, we sing in Lecha Dodi, “Shake yourself off! Arise from the
dust! … Awaken, awaken! For your light has arrived. Arise, my light!” Devorah
too sang, “Wake up, wake up! [said] Devorah. Awake! Awake! Utter a song!” (Shoftim
5:12). On Shabbos, we are healed from that sickness of the six days of the week
– heavy-heartedness, sadness, and despair, which often debilitates us even more
than the swords of our enemies.
Tu
BiShvat begins tomorrow night. On this day when the earliest-blooming trees awaken
from the inactivity of winter in Eretz Yisroel, we eat from the seven fruits
for which the land of Israel is praised, including the tamar – the date.
According to the passuk, Devorah judged the people sitting under the Tomer
Devorah – the date palm of Devorah (Shoftim 4:5). Why a date palm
specifically? According to Chazal, the secret of the date is that “Just
as the date has only one heart [pit], so too the Jewish people have only one
heart for their Father in Heaven” (Sukkah 45b).
And
one of our Jewish mothers, Tamar, also gave life to Dovid HaMelech and Moshiach
because she did not give up hope of carrying on Yehuda’s lineage, even when he
gave up. Commenting on the passuk, “The tzaddik blossoms like a Tamar,
he grows like a cedar in the Lebanon” (Tehillim 92:13), Chazal
say, “Just as the date palm has a beautiful appearance and all of its fruits
are sweet and good, so too the son of David will be beautiful of appearance and
all of his deeds will be sweet and good before Hashem” (Midrash Shochar Tov
on Tehillim 92). Moshiach’s great-grandmother Tamar gave him and
all of us the wherewithal to live beautiful lives.
My
wife showed me a beautiful article that illustrates this perfectly. Several rebbetzins
and educators were interviewed. One woman, Mrs. Miryam Swerdlov, a Chabad
educator in Crown Heights, wrote the following about her parents, particularly
her mother:
My parents have
always been inspiration to me, as well. I was born in Russia and came to
America when I was a little girl. Life was not easy for us, but I didn’t know
it. My father walked with his cane his entire life, but he was never bitter. He
would say in Yiddish, “Pick up your cane in your hand and start walking.” That
is how we lived. We were taught, no matter what life gives you, you keep
walking.
Although I have
limited memories of my mother, since I was so young when she died, I do
remember that she would sing constantly while working in the kitchen. Sometimes
she would sing liebedig songs, and sometimes she would sing slow songs.
I could always tell what mood she was in by what songs she sang. I learnt from
her that no matter what you are going through, you must put yourself together,
put on the best you have, put on your makeup, comb your sheitel, and
walk out with your shoulders back and your head held high, because you can do
it.
That is what Jewish
women like Tamar, Miriam, Devorah, Yael, Esther, and Mrs. Swerdlov’s mother
bring to us. Through their love and belief in us and Hashem’s providence, they
tell us, “You can do it!” Just like Miriam and Devorah, may the merit of Jewish
women herald the time when we will “Sing to Hashem a new song” )Tehillim
98:1) with the coming of the great-grandson of our mother Tamar, Moshiach
Tzidkeinu, soon in our days.
Making a Mockery - Rav Moshe Weinberger on Parshas Bo 5779
Below, please find this adaptation of Rav Weinberger's drasha from last Shabbos, parshas Bo 5779. Rav Weinberger has reviewed this write-up and any corrections are incorporated herein. Enjoy!
Rav
Moshe Weinberger
Parshas
Bo 5779
Making a Mockery
Did Hashem inflict
the ten plagues on Egypt as a prank? The passuk in this week’s parshah
says, “In order that you should relate in the ears of your son and your son’s
son that I have made a mockery of Egypt and the signs that I have placed on
them, and they shall know that I am Hashem” (Shmos 10:2). Rashi
explains that Hashem was saying, “I made a joke” of Egypt. First, can it really
be that Hashem performed all those miracles in order to play a joke on the
Egyptians? And why does Hashem care so much that “they [the Egyptians] shall
know that I am Hashem?”
The Degel Machaneh
Ephraim zy’a, taught in the name of his grandfather, the Baal Shem Tov zy’a,
that there is a little Egyptian within every Jew. He explains that because we
lived in Egypt for so long, they became almost completely immersed in the
impurity of Egypt. When the passuk says that Hashem did the plagues so
“they,” the Egyptians, would know that “I am Hashem,” this was not referring to
the Egyptians themselves. It was referring to the Egyptian aspect within each
Jew. Hashem did the plagues so that the Jewish people themselves would finally
be able to let go of their attachments to the course physicality of Egypt.
Why is this force of
impurity within a Jew called “Egypt?” According to the Mei HaShiloach, the
Torah calls Egypt the “garden of G-d” (Bereishis 13:10) because it was a
such a lush environment, filled with every blessing from G-d, where one could
enjoy all of the pleasures of the physical world. This level of physical luxury
is why the Midrash says that until the Jewish people left, a slave had never
fled Egypt (Mechilta Yisro 1). There was no constituency of Egyptians
demanding that a wall be built around the country and that the Canaanites
should pay for it. No slave had ever fled before because despite all of the
hard physical labor, those in bondage were also enslaved to the physical
desires they could only satisfy in Egypt.
Even today, we see so
many people enslaved to substances or behaviors even though they know how bad
they are. They feel they are simply unable to flee. There are those who engage
in illicit behaviors, whether online or with other people even though they know
they are, in some cases, destroying their jobs, their families, and themselves.
They cannot imagine life without their drug of choice.
We see this with
regard to the desire for wealth as well. I know people who made enough money to
live on for the rest of their lives 30 years ago, but they continue trying to
make new fortunes rather than learn in the beis medrash or use their
entrepreneurial spirit to spearhead projects that would help other people
directly. Such people also cannot imagine living without a certain type of home
or without a certain type of kitchen.
Whatever the flavor
of excessive attachment, whether to money, illicit desires, food, some
substance, or almost any other form of pleasure to which a person can become obsessed,
the intense form of pleasure forms a border around the person. It blinds him
from seeing the broader world. It makes him or her smallminded. The Hebrew word
for Egypt – מצרים – comes from the word
meaning “border” or “limit.” Being a slave to the pleasures of this world puts
blinders on a person, binding him into a tiny world where he cannot imagine
anything greater than a life filled with his indulgence of choice.
But imagine if a
person could see these silly little pleasures not as his whole world, but for
the absurd joke that they are. Anyone who reads the book of Devarim or
has read Tanach knows that the desire to worship idols used to be
overpowering, intoxicating, and almost inescapable. Yet do any of us feel drawn
to bow down to a crucifix on a Sunday morning? Even the suggestion is
laughable. Ever since Chazal nullified this desire (Yuma 69b),
the temptation for idol worship has become ridiculous in our eyes.
It was critical that
Hashem make a mockery out of their pleasure-seeking lifestyle that the Egyptian
part of ourselves felt drawn to. He knew the only way we would be able to be the
first slaves to flee Egypt was to first release the psychological stranglehold
that materialistic place had on our psyches by demonstrating its absurdity.
Similarly, when Moshiach
comes and Hashem slaughters the evil inclination (Sukkah 52a; Bava
Basra 16a), “our mouths will be filled with laughter” (Tehillim
126:2) when we look back at the years we spent working excessively or
pleasure-seeking. “How ridiculous we were. How could we have been so foolish?
How could we have fallen into an obsession with such drivel? What have we
done?!”
How did the miracles
of the ten plagues accomplish this? Hashem knew the only way we could escape
from the small-mindedness of Egypt was to expose us to true greatness. As Rav
Moshe Chaim Luzzatto zt’l, explains at the beginning of Messilas
Yesharim, “Man was only created to delight in Hashem…. This is the true
pleasure.” When a Jew tastes the pleasure of plumbing the depths of a Gemara
or experiencing that “Aha!” moment when he comprehends the profound depth
hidden in the words of a particularly difficult Tosafos, the shallow,
small material pleasures of this world feel like a joke by comparison.
This is the entire
theme of Shir HaShirm, which begins, “Your love is better than wine” (Shir
HaShirim 1:2) because “your love [is better] to me more than any wine
banquet and more than any pleasure and joy” (Rashi). The passuk
uses this expression “because He gave them His Torah and spoke to them face to
face, and that love is still more pleasant to them than any pleasure” (ibid.).
All of this is why
the Torah separates the first seven plagues into last week’s parshah and
the last three into this week’s parshah. The Torah only explains that
the purpose of the plagues is to inculcate “knowledge” beginning with the first
of the last three plagues (Shmos 10:2). This is because the first seven
plagues correspond to the 7 emotional characteristics (chessed, gevurah,
tiferes, netzach, hod, yesod, and malchus). The
last three plagues, on the other hand, correspond to the three intellectual
faculties, chochmah, binah, and daas – wisdom, insight,
and knowledge. It is only when our minds absorb the message that the
pleasure-seeking Egyptian life is a joke that we can begin to leave Egypt.
How can we, today,
rise to a level where the pleasures of the world seem silly compared to the
greatness we are capable of attaining? Rebbeinu Yona, at the beginning of Shaarei
HaAvodah, writes that, “The first step for a spiritual seeker is to know
his own value, recognizing his own strengths and the strengths of his
forefathers, as well as their greatness, esteem, anb beloved status to Hashem.
And he should work and continually strengthen himself to live up to that
standard.” By taking out time to think about the greatness Hashem placed within
us and the inner power we have inside as a birthright passed on to us from
Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov, we eventually start to see the absurdity and
silliness of materials pursuits by comparison.
Rav Yaakov Weinberg zt’l,
relates a parable to help us understand how to pass this higher perspective on
to our children. In it, a boy is playing baseball with his friends in a park
that happens to be adjacent to a Jewish cemetery. In the midst of the game,
this boy is playing in the outfield when the batter hits a home run. The ball
sailed over the fence into the cemetery. The rule of the game is that the
outfielder closest to the ball must jump the fence to retrieve it so that the
game can continue. So, this boy began to put his leg over the fence to jump
over when he suddenly felt his father embrace him, saying, “No, my son, you
cannot go into the cemetery.” Not wanting to be different from others or have
restrictions placed on him, he responds, “But Dad, the outfielder always has to
get the ball. All of the other boys do it. Why am I worse than them?”
The boy’s father
responds, “No my son. You are not ‘worse’ than the other boys. On the contrary,
you are a descendant of Aharon HaKohein and you have within you an even higher
level of holiness than other Jewish people. You cannot go into a cemetery not
because you are lower than others, but because, in a certain way, you have an
even greater level of holiness within you. It is beneath you to enter a place
of impurity because you are part of something greater.”
May Hashem bless us to
recognize our own greatness and the awesome potential to conquer the emptiness
of the world’s pursuits for G-dliness. May He cause us to experience the depth,
intense pleasure, and sweetness of Yiddishkeit so that we will not have
to struggle so mightily to escape from the small-mindedness of a purely
material life and connect to Hashem and the broad-minded path ofTorah!
Sunday, January 6, 2019
Two Types of Leadership - Rav Moshe Weinberger's Drasha on Parshas Va'eira 5779
Below, please find this adaptation of Rav Weinberger's drasha from this Shabbos, parshas Va'eira 5779. I usually do not include the personal remarks Rav Weinberger makes for smachos in the shul, but as at the request of one of the fathers of the young couple who just got married on Sunday, I did include these remarks here. Rav Weinberger has reviewed this write-up and any corrections are incorporated herein. Enjoy!
Rav Moshe Weinberger
Parshas Va’eira 5779
Two Types of Leadership
Let
us understand what the Torah teaches us about what it means to be a true Jewish
leader based on one Rashi in this week’s parshah. First, we know
that love comes in two varieties, conditional and unconditional. In the
language of Chazal, these are called “love which is dependent on something” and
“love which is not dependent on something” (Avos 5:16).
Although
there are a wide spectrum of personality traits for both mothers and fathers,
generally speaking, fathers tend more toward conditional love and mothers tend
more toward unconditional love. Children, especially boys, often experience
their fathers as having a strict set of expectations for them. And their
expressions of love are predicated on the fulfillment of those expectations. Many
men find communicating the depth of their love for their children very
difficult unless their hopes, dreams, and expectations for them are met.
Mothers,
on the other hand, generally have an easier time communicating their love for
their children no matter what. Children need to grow up with expectations and
the fatherly love which comes with the fulfillment of those expectations to increase
their chance of success in life. But without that immovable motherly love
undergirding the measures of success they attempt to attain, they cannot
survive. They cannot go on. If a person lacks that foundation of unconditional
love, demands and expectations are likely to completely break a person.
This
dichotomy exists in the two primary ways Hashem expresses Himself in His
relationship with us – as The Holy One Blessed is He (the fatherly expression)
and the Divine Presence (the motherly expression). The masculine side manifests
itself through psukim like, “Ifyou will walk in my
statutes and observe My mitzvos and do them, I shall give you rain in
its time, the earth shall give its produce, and the tree of the field its
fruit” (Vayikra 26:3-4). The promises are predicated by the word “If.”
These expressions of Hashem’s love come with strings attached.
On
the other hand, Hashem manifests His motherly side through psukim like,
“And even when they are in the land of their enemy, I will not despise or hate
them to destroy them to nullify My covenant with them, for I am Hashem their
G-d” (Vayikra 26:44) and “Who dwells with them within their impurity” (Vayikra
16:16). Hashem shows us that He loves us unconditionally, no matter what, and
nothing can sever our connection to Him.
This
parental and Divine dichotomy also presents itself in the two paradigmatic
leaders of our people – Moshe and Aharon. As the Gemara says, “Moshe
would say, ‘Let justice pierce the mountain [i.e., be absolute]’” (Sanhedrin
6b). We explained that fathers often have difficulty expressing their love when
their children do not meet their expectations. As the Maharal explains
in Gevuros Hashem (28), sometimes great, spiritual people are unable to
communicate to others the depth of what is in their heart. As intellectually
lofty as they are, they lack a fully developed power of speech, which is a
lower-order, but critical, faculty.
While
we cannot understand the complexity of Moshe’s greatness, he himself
acknowledged this difficulty when he said, “I am not a man of words” (Shmos
4:10), the last letters of which spell “Shamai” – the tana who
paradigmatically expressed strict judgment. The Torah says about Aharon, on the
other hand, “And he will be a mouth for you” (ibid. 16), the initial letters of
which spell “Hillel” – the tana who paradigmatically expressed mercy. And
it was Hillel who said. “Be of the students of Aharon” (Avos 1:12).
We
see that this dichotomy in their leadership styles played itself out in the
Torah as well. Even though Moshe loved the Jewish people deeply, after the sin
of the golden calf, he distanced himself from them, always placing a veil over
his face (Shmos 34:33) and moving his tent outside the camp )ibid. 33:7) . Moshe ascended Mount
Sinai to commune with Hashem alone, while Aharon remained with the people,
trying to work with them in their confusion and delay their sin, hoping that
Moshe would return before it went too far.
Aharon
was a motherly figure to us, always together with the people, speaking their
language and showing them his love for them. By acting as Moshe’s “mouth,” he was always
there for us to translate what Moshe was saying into language we could
understand. That is why, in the union between Hashem and the Jewish people, Chazal
call Moshe the King’s (Hashem’s) “best man” and Aharon the Bride’s (Jewish
people’s) “maid of honor” (III Zohar 20a).
Which
type of leadership is more important or takes precedence? Strict expectations
or unconditional love? We find the answer in a Rashi in this week’s
parshah on the passuk, “That is Aharon and Moshe” (Shmos 6:26). Rashi
asks, “In some places, the Torah places Aharon before Moshe, and in other
places, it places Moshe before Aharon.” Why does it do this? “To tell us that
they are equal.” The Torah wants us to know that both types of leadership are equally
essential. We need leaders who are not afraid to make demands on their constituents,
who are not satisfied with the status quo. Without this fatherly type of
leadership, we would not grow or elevate ourselves. But without an undergirding
of immovable love, we would lack the emotional wherewithal to survive, much
less achieve what our leaders ask of us.
Now
that we know both types of leadership, Moshe’s and Aharon’s, are equally
essentially, we must ask ourselves which one comes first, and which one comes
second. The Torah explicitly tells us this when it says, “And Moshe was eighty
years old and Aharon was eighty-three years old when they spoke to Pharaoh” (Shmos
7:7). Hashem brought Aharon into the world three years before Moshe to teach us
that when educating our children or leading those in our charge, we will fail
if we do not first establish motherly, Aharon-like love. Attempting to set
expectations and demands without pre-establishing a foundation of love is not a
recipe for success.
There
was once a community leader in the Hungarian community of Tisefird who
commissioned the writing of a Sefer Torah and held a great hachnasas
Sefer Torah ceremony upon its completion in the mid-1800’s. He invited two
great tzadikim from the region to this celebration, Rav Tzvi Hirsch from
Liska zy’a, and Rav Hillel from Kolmaya zy’a. Though these two tzadikim
were equally great, they could not have been more different from one another in
disposition. While both would have liked to spend Shabbos and the beginning of
the week in the wealthy man’s community, Rav Hillel Kolmayer was not able to
come for that Shabbos, but postponed his visit to the following week.
During
his visit the first week, Rav Tzvi Hirsch could not stop himself from praising
the community in general, and the wealthy man hosting the hachnasas Sefer
Torah in particular, for the great honor they showed for the Torah and for
those who study it. He praised the community and blessed them that they should
continue honoring the Torah. Everyone felt elevated and strengthened by the
Rebbe’s visit and his encouraging words.
The
following week with Rav Hillel Kolmayer was completely different. He asked to
speak to the entire congregation Shabbos morning and began by saying, “It is a
shame that the donor of the Sefer Torah is providing a covering for the
Torah but not providing his wife with the proper clothing to cover herself
appropriately.” His message to the community only became harsher from there. He
criticized its departures from traditional Jewish customs as in keeping with
the ways of the “Enlightenment” and influenced by the evil inclination. The
Rebbe’s criticism of the wealthy man in particular, and the community in
general, continued throughout his visit.
After
Rav Hillel had left the community, they were reeling and feeling broken. The
wealthy man sent a messenger to Rav Tzvi Hirsch, ostensibly to ask how he could
reconcile his praise of the community with Rav Hillel’s staunch criticism. In
reality, he was probably hoping to stir up a dispute between the tzaddikim
by obtaining a letter from Rav Tzvi Hirsch criticizing Rav Hillel’s strict
approach. He did not receive the answer for which he hoped.
Rav
Tzvi Hirsch explained that both his and Rav Hillel’s approaches were correct.
As the Torah tells us in parshas Shmos, “And the king of Egypt said to
the Jewish midwives, ones of whose name was Shifra and the name of the second
was Puah” (Shmos 1:15). There are two ways to give life to the Jewish
people. There is the way of Shifra, whose name means “beautiful,” which is to
see the beauty and goodness in others, encouraging them to see the good in
themselves. He said about himself, “I cannot help myself. Hashem made me a ‘Shifra’
Yid. My way is seeing and showing Jews the good in themselves and in others.”
Rav
Tzvi Hirsch continued by telling the messenger that Rav Hillel is a “Puah” Yid.
The name Puah is an onomatopoeia implying that this midwife made “Pu, pu”
sounds to soothe the babies she helped deliver. Thus, Puah is a name implying
speech. Rav Hillel’s way is giving life to the Jewish people by speaking to
them, by giving them mussar. Rav Tzvi Hirsch explained to the wealthy
man’s messenger that the Jewish people need both types of leadership. They need
the Aharon/motherly/Shifra approach to develop the emotional and psychological
wherewithal to believe in themselves. And they need the Moshe/fatherly/Puah
approach to challenge themselves and grow.
May
Hashem grant us leaders, rebbeim, and teachers who know when we need the
Aharon/motherly/unconditional love approach and when we need the
Moshe/fatherly/conditional love approach. And may He open our hearts and our
minds to accept both forms of leadership equally so that we may fulfill our
communal and individual potentials such that we merit bringing the ultimate leader
into this world, Moshiach Tzidkeinu with the arrival of the complete
redemption soon in our days.
Click here to get Dixie Yid in your e-mail Inbox or here to "follow" me on Twitter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)