Currently, the spec describes ArrayMemberInitialization so: ArrayMemberInitialization: AssignExpression AssignExpression : AssignExpression However, considering the following: struct test { int i; } static test[] tests = [ {1}, ]; Compiles just fine, I believe the spec to be incorrect. Instead, it might be: ArrayMemberInitialization: AssignExpression AssignExpression : AssignExpression StructInitializer AssignExpression : StructInitializer ArrayInitializer AssignExpression : ArrayInitializer That said, this compiles too: struct test { int[] i; } static test tests = { [1, 2, 3] }; So it might seem that StructMemberInitializer would need the reverse change, becoming: StructMemberInitializer: AssignExpression Identifier : AssignExpression ArrayInitializer Identifier : ArrayInitializer StructInitializer Identifier : StructInitializer
Indeed, ctod.html has an example of array initialisers nested within each other. So obviously, the documented ArrayMemberInitialization syntax is inaccurate. Moreover, why not make it a little simpler: ArrayMemberInitialization: Initializer AssignExpression : Initializer StructMemberInitialization: // let's make the naming consistent Initializer Identifier : Initializer
Fixed DMD 0.178
AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) / アドレス: モード: デフォルト 音声ブラウザ ルビ付き 配色反転 文字拡大 モバイル