homepage

If the port argument is a number, getaddrinfo attempts to convert it to a C long, that raises OverflowError if the conversion fails.
Instead, getaddrinfo should convert the port to a string (bytes) directly and rely on the underlying getaddrinfo to return EAI_SERVICE. This is also consistent with the case when a numeric port is passed as a string.

What do you mean by converting the port to a string (bytes) directly? Can you provide an example?

Use PyObject_Str and PyUnicode_AsUTF8 if the port argument is a PyLong instead of converting it to an intermediate C long that may raise OverflowError. See getaddrinfo_overflow_error.patch

Now I understand your idea. It looks reasonable to me. Could you create a pull request on GitHub? Please provide also tests, add a Misc/NEWS entry and add your name in Misc/ACKS.
But how large is the performance hit of this change? It adds at least one additional memory allocation for the str object. If the slowdown is significant perhaps it is worth to keep the old code as a fast path.

Why can't the user simply pass in a string service name in the first place?

> But how large is the performance hit of this change? It adds at least one additional memory allocation for the str object. If the slowdown is significant perhaps it is worth to keep the old code as a fast path.
commit 5cc7ac24da10568d2a910a91a24183b904118cf8
./python -m timeit -s 'import socket' 'socket.getaddrinfo(None, 1000)'
2000 loops, best of 5: 139 usec per loop
./python -m timeit -s 'import socket' 'socket.getaddrinfo(None, "1000")'
2000 loops, best of 5: 142 usec per loop
with getaddrinfo_overflow_error.patch
./python -m timeit -s 'import socket' 'socket.getaddrinfo(None, 1000)'
2000 loops, best of 5: 140 usec per loop
./python -m timeit -s 'import socket' 'socket.getaddrinfo(None, "1000")'
2000 loops, best of 5: 139 usec per loop
It seems the impact on performance is negligible/not measurable.

I like your idea about getting rid of OverflowError. But wouldn't it make the problem with other reported by you issue, issue30711, worse?

> Why can't the user simply pass in a string service name in the first place?
He/she can. But I don't propose to change that. The patch only changes the way a given number is converted to a string. That is, without an intermediate C long.

> I like your idea about getting rid of OverflowError. But wouldn't it make the problem with other reported by you issue, issue30711, worse?
It depends on the implementation of the underlying getaddrinfo. For Modules/getaddrinfo.c, it will be worse for positive numbers outside the C long range.

The original pull request has been closed as inactive. If the original author is interested in pursuing this issue, it can be reopened or someone else can create a new pull request to replace it.

Hi Cheryl Sabella, the pull request that got closed is the one for issue 30711. The pull request for this one has never been reviewed.