homepage

I basically copied all the svn:ignore props into this file...

I don't know if we should pollute the SVN tree with random VCS stuff.

Given how Bazaar is not an official choice for the repository adding 
this kind of thing will lead to a road to add such information for Hg 
and other VCSes as well in order to be fair to all.

I'd like to get Barry's opinion on this, since he added the experimental
Bazaar branches. I think it's reasonable as long as they're "offical"
VCS branches.

But isn't that Bazaar thing totally stand-alone from the SVN 
repository? What experimental branches are you talking about?

http://www.python.org/dev/bazaar/ 

it should be no problem to add this to the bzr repository. this is where
it belongs.

I don't think that will work (at the moment.) The Bazaar repo is an
exact copy (on a cron job) of the Subversion one, so we can't add files.
Also, those using bzr-svn would miss out on the .bzrignore file.

Wouldn't it be the job of the synchronisation job to automatically
create a .bzrignore file from the SVN ignore properties?

Automation would be wonderful, but that still doesn't solve bzr-svn
problem. In the future, bzr-svn should be able to deal with svn:ignore
props, but it can't now. Should the Bazaar experiment fail, I'd just
like to remind you that "environmental cleanup" (aka pollution removal)
is only one "svn rm" away...

Personally, I think it would be fine to add one .bzrignore file at the
top of the tree. I would also have no problem adding one for hg if some
Mercurial fan asks for it. As you say, cleaning up afterward is a
simple 'rm' away.

Georg, Ralf, and Jeroen, are you ok with me checking this in now?

Go ahead. I'm not a committer, merely a person on the side.

the same is true for me.

Added in r26330.