This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2015年02月25日 02:58 by zwol, last changed 2022年04月11日 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg236560 - (view) | Author: Zack Weinberg (zwol) * | Date: 2015年02月25日 02:58 | |
I tripped over a couple of SyntaxError cases where the diagnostic caret is misplaced. >>> While x: File "<stdin>", line 1 While x: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax The caret should point to the capital W in 'While'. >>> for x in the range(10): File "<stdin>", line 1 for x in the range(10): ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax The caret should point to the 'the'. |
|||
| msg236561 - (view) | Author: Zachary Ware (zach.ware) * (Python committer) | Date: 2015年02月25日 04:05 | |
The caret is correct: >>> While = 'some string' >>> While 'some string' >>> the = range(10) >>> the range(0, 10) >>> for x in the: pass ... >>> In both cases, the error is having an expression followed by an expression, and the caret points at the second expression. There's nothing wrong with 'While' and 'the', they're perfectly legitimate names, though rarely used. |
|||
| msg236579 - (view) | Author: Zack Weinberg (zwol) * | Date: 2015年02月25日 14:45 | |
In terms of the formal grammar of the language, you are correct. However, the position of the caret should be chosen based *not* on the formal grammar, but on a heuristic estimation of what the most probable mistake actually is. In both of the cases I listed, the most probable mistake is as I described. Please reconsider. |
|||
| msg236582 - (view) | Author: Zachary Ware (zach.ware) * (Python committer) | Date: 2015年02月25日 15:13 | |
The problem is, the interpreter can't know what you meant to do, so it can only point out what it can't compile. We did recently add a special case for print without parentheses, but adding special cases for everything is just not feasible. Besides, where should the caret point in each of these cases, why, and how would you explain it to the parser? for x in the range(10): for x in range(10) the: for x in range(10) range(10): for each x in range(10): for x each in range(10): Those are just some of the possibilities for just the for statement, let alone every other statement, or even every place an expression can be used. If you can come up with a good, simple, general patch that covers every case, please do so! I'm quite sure it would be accepted. But until then, I'm afraid this isn't going to happen. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022年04月11日 14:58:13 | admin | set | github: 67706 |
| 2015年02月25日 15:13:42 | zach.ware | set | status: open -> closed messages: + msg236582 |
| 2015年02月25日 14:45:33 | zwol | set | status: closed -> open messages: + msg236579 |
| 2015年02月25日 04:05:14 | zach.ware | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + zach.ware messages: + msg236561 resolution: not a bug stage: resolved |
| 2015年02月25日 02:58:19 | zwol | create | |