This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2012年03月07日 11:09 by scoder, last changed 2022年04月11日 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (7) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg155072 - (view) | Author: Stefan Behnel (scoder) * (Python committer) | Date: 2012年03月07日 11:09 | |
Based on the existing "test_attempted_yield_from_loop" in Lib/test/test_pep380.py, I wrote this test and I wonder why it does not work: """ def test_attempted_reentry(): """ >>> for line in test_attempted_reentry(): print(line) g1: starting Yielded: y1 g1: about to yield from g2 g2: starting Yielded: y2 g2: about to yield from g1 g2: caught ValueError Yielded: y3 g1: after delegating to g2 Yielded: y4 """ trace = [] def g1(): trace.append("g1: starting") yield "y1" trace.append("g1: about to yield from g2") yield from g2() trace.append("g1: after delegating to g2") yield "y4" def g2(): trace.append("g2: starting") yield "y2" trace.append("g2: about to yield from g1") try: yield from gi except ValueError: trace.append("g2: caught ValueError") else: trace.append("g1 did not raise ValueError on reentry") yield "y3" gi = g1() for y in gi: trace.append("Yielded: %s" % (y,)) return trace """ In current CPython, I get this: """ Failed example: for line in test_attempted_reentry(): print(line) Expected: g1: starting Yielded: y1 g1: about to yield from g2 g2: starting Yielded: y2 g2: about to yield from g1 g2: caught ValueError Yielded: y3 g1: after delegating to g2 Yielded: y4 Got: g1: starting Yielded: y1 g1: about to yield from g2 g2: starting Yielded: y2 g2: about to yield from g1 g2: caught ValueError Yielded: y3 """ Even though I catch the ValueError (raised on generator reentry) at the position where I run the "yield from", the outer generator (g1) does not continue to run after the termination of g2. It shouldn't normally have an impact on the running g1 that someone attempts to jump back into it, but it clearly does here. I noticed this while trying to adapt the implementation for Cython, because the original test was one of the few failing cases and it made the code jump through the generator support code quite wildly. |
|||
| msg155112 - (view) | Author: Stefan Behnel (scoder) * (Python committer) | Date: 2012年03月07日 20:06 | |
Here is an analysis of this (less verbose) code:
def g1():
yield "y1"
yield from g2()
yield "y4"
def g2():
yield "y2"
try:
yield from gi
except ValueError:
pass # catch "already running" error
yield "y3"
gi = g1()
for y in gi:
print("Yielded: %s" % (y,))
This is what it currently does:
1) g1() delegates to a new g2()
2) g2 delegates back to the g1 instance and asks for its next value
3) Python sees the active delegation in g1 and asks g2 for its next value
4) g2 sees that it's already running and throws an exception
Ok so far. Now:
5) the exception is propagated into g1 at call level 3), not at level 1)!
6) g1 undelegates and terminates by the exception
7) g2 catches the exception, yields "y3" and then terminates normally
8) g1 gets control back but has already terminated and does nothing
Effect: "y4" is not yielded anymore.
The problem is in steps 5) and 6), which are handled by g1 at the wrong call level. They shouldn't lead to undelegation and termination in g1, just to an exception being raised in g2.
|
|||
| msg155132 - (view) | Author: Alyssa Coghlan (ncoghlan) * (Python committer) | Date: 2012年03月07日 23:48 | |
Added Mark Shannon to the nosy list - he's been tinkering with this area of the interpreter lately. This definitely needs to be fixed though (even if that does mean major surgery on the implementation, up to and including the introduction of an __iter_from__ method) |
|||
| msg155133 - (view) | Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) * (Python committer) | Date: 2012年03月07日 23:52 | |
Don't worry! I'll be fixing it in a moment... |
|||
| msg155134 - (view) | Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) (Python triager) | Date: 2012年03月07日 23:57 | |
New changeset 3357eac1ba62 by Benjamin Peterson in branch 'default': make delegating generators say they running (closes #14220) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3357eac1ba62 |
|||
| msg155151 - (view) | Author: Stefan Behnel (scoder) * (Python committer) | Date: 2012年03月08日 06:31 | |
Ah, yes, that should work in both implementations. I'll give it a try. Thanks! |
|||
| msg155183 - (view) | Author: Mark Shannon (Mark.Shannon) * (Python committer) | Date: 2012年03月08日 21:13 | |
I've just added issue 14230 which overlaps with this issue somewhat. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022年04月11日 14:57:27 | admin | set | github: 58428 |
| 2012年03月08日 21:13:37 | Mark.Shannon | set | messages: + msg155183 |
| 2012年03月08日 20:32:45 | benjamin.peterson | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed |
| 2012年03月08日 06:31:05 | scoder | set | status: closed -> open resolution: fixed -> (no value) messages: + msg155151 |
| 2012年03月07日 23:57:16 | python-dev | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + python-dev messages: + msg155134 resolution: fixed stage: resolved |
| 2012年03月07日 23:52:06 | benjamin.peterson | set | nosy:
+ benjamin.peterson messages: + msg155133 |
| 2012年03月07日 23:48:21 | ncoghlan | set | nosy:
+ Mark.Shannon messages: + msg155132 |
| 2012年03月07日 22:37:12 | pitrou | set | nosy:
+ ncoghlan |
| 2012年03月07日 20:06:10 | scoder | set | messages: + msg155112 |
| 2012年03月07日 11:09:02 | scoder | create | |