homepage

The tracer set with sys.settrace() is called incorrectly with a 'line' event on a 'pass' that is at the end of an 'else' clause on the final line of a function even if the else block is not executed by the interpreter. Whew, talk about an end case! The attached file illustrates this.

Sorry, the print statement in the file needs a tweak to work with Python 3.2, but the bug does occur there also.

(Snippet examples can be made 2/3 agnostic with 
from __future__ import print_function)
3.2.2 on win7, IDLE, gives me
F:\Python\mypy\tem.py 7 call
F:\Python\mypy\tem.py 8 line
F:\Python\mypy\tem.py 10 line
F:\Python\mypy\tem.py 11 line
F:\Python\mypy\tem.py 13 line
F:\Python\mypy\tem.py 13 return
...
Commenting out else:pass or changing pass to r=2 changes the output to
F:\Python\mypy\tem.py 7 call
F:\Python\mypy\tem.py 8 line
F:\Python\mypy\tem.py 10 line
F:\Python\mypy\tem.py 11 line
F:\Python\mypy\tem.py 11 return
Looking as the dis outputs of the three versions, I find the difference of behavior somewhat puzzling.

The reason for this behavior is that the trace function is called whenever execution in the bytecode jumps to a new source line. See ceval.c line 4440 or so:
 /* If the last instruction falls at the start of a line or if
 it represents a jump backwards, update the frame's line
 number and call the trace function. */
Running dis.dis on x in the example file shows that the bytecode for returning None is assigned to the "pass" line.
I think the bug here is really with the line number assignment in the bytecode, not with the tracing, but I don't see an obvious way to fix it.

Reproduced on 3.11. 
An implicit return doesn't have a line, so it's not clear what should happen. Assigning the next line to it wouldn't be correct either (it could be the first line of the next function). 
We could say that in this case there is no line event, just a return event (unless that messes up the tracer somehow).
If you add a return statement it makes sense:
/Users/iritkatriel/src/cpython/mm.py 7 call
/Users/iritkatriel/src/cpython/mm.py 8 line
/Users/iritkatriel/src/cpython/mm.py 10 line
/Users/iritkatriel/src/cpython/mm.py 11 line
/Users/iritkatriel/src/cpython/mm.py 14 line
/Users/iritkatriel/src/cpython/mm.py 14 return
(line 13 does not appear because that's the else, the return is assigned line 14 which is where it really is).

This seems to be fixed. On 3.11.0a2 installed on Windows and fresh build of .0a2+, I see return on line 11, which is correct.
f:\dev3円x>python ../tem/tem.py
Running Debug|x64 interpreter...
f:\dev\tem\tem.py 7 call
f:\dev\tem\tem.py 8 line
f:\dev\tem\tem.py 10 line
f:\dev\tem\tem.py 11 line
f:\dev\tem\tem.py 11 return
Irit, please confirm (or not) on your *nix system.

Terry, I'm pretty sure I saw the problem on the mac earlier. Can you paste the contents of tem.py?

The attached badlineevent.py with print updated.

Yes, you're right. I don't know what I thought I saw before. It works on the mac as well.