homepage

A test giving a strange warning can make a poor user nervous. Here's
a minimal patch to calm his nerves. It would be better to only give
the message if python -b (not -bb) is active, but I do not know how.
diff -prU2 Lib/test/test_os.py Lib/test/test_os.py
--- Lib/test/test_os.py
+++ Lib/test/test_os.py
@@ -443,4 +443,7 @@ class EnvironTests(mapping_tests.BasicTe
 test_env = {'PATH': os.pathsep.join(test_path)}
 
+ if os.supports_bytes_environ:
+ print("This test may give some 'BytesWarning's.", file=sys.stderr)
+
 saved_environ = os.environ
 try:

I don't see any bytes warnings when I run test_os with -b or -bb on linux on py3k trunk. (If there were such a warning and it was expected, the fix would be to capture the warning and ignore it.)
Under what circumstances do you see this warning?

R. David Murray writes:
> I don't see any bytes warnings when I run test_os with -b or -bb on
> linux on py3k trunk. (If there were such a warning and it was expected,
> the fix would be to capture the warning and ignore it.)
> 
> Under what circumstances do you see this warning?
Python 3.2a3, test_os with python -b.

Can you give the exact command line you are using to run it, and the OS and version, and perhaps a printenv? I can't reproduce it in 3.1 or 3.2a3.

Running it with -E and seeing if that changes the behavior would also be useful.

I guess you're not seeing them because Victor silenced them a couple of days ago in r85902.
Hallvard, if you update your py3k working copy, do these warnings disappear?

Ah, then this report is probably out of date. I just realized that I ran my 3.2a3 test incorrectly, so my report that I didn't see them there is invalid.

Antoine Pitrou writes:
> Hallvard, if you update your py3k working copy, do these warnings disappear?
Yes, switching to the svn version shuts them up.